Lahoud v Lahoud [2012] NSWCA 401
The court held that the reservation of further consideration in the March 2006 orders did not authorise retrospective removal or reduction of entitlement to interest already accrued under those orders. Variation could only affect the accruing of interest for future periods and not affect the quantum of accrued entitlement. No error was found in the factual evaluations regarding delays attributable to the respondents; thus, relief could not be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal – Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judgments and Orders' 'interest on Costs' 'variation of Orders' 'delay in Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal – Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a subsequent order may vary existing regime by removing entitlement to interest already accrued' 'Whether relief from payment of interest on costs should be granted due to delay' 'Construction and effect of reservation of further consideration and liberty to apply' 'Correct evaluation of factual findings relating to alleged delay']
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the reservation of further consideration in the March 2006 orders did not authorise retrospective removal or reduction of entitlement to interest already accrued under those orders. Variation could only affect the accruing of interest for future periods and not affect the quantum of accrued entitlement. No error was found in the factual evaluations regarding delays attributable to the respondents; thus, relief could not be granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' "Order that the appellants pay the respondents' costs of the appeal"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment