Hancock v Rinehart (Errata) [2016] NSWSC 72

Hancock v Rinehart (Errata) [2016] NSWSC 72

It is neither useful nor appropriate to correct the matters mentioned as they are immaterial to the issues decided, and should reflect the evidence before the court at the time of trial, not subsequent extraneous facts.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Correction of Judgment / Post Judgment Motion
Outcome
Application denied
Legal Topics
['judgments and Orders' 'correction of Judgment' 'immaterial Errors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Correction of Judgment / Post Judgment Motion

  1. 1 ['Whether the judgment should be corrected to reflect alleged factual inaccuracies or typographical errors' 'Whether the alleged errors are material to the decision']

Ratio Decidendi

It is neither useful nor appropriate to correct the matters mentioned as they are immaterial to the issues decided, and should reflect the evidence before the court at the time of trial, not subsequent extraneous facts.

Court Disposition

Application denied

Orders

  • []