CRB17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 762
There was no jurisdictional error or lack of procedural fairness in the Tribunal's handling of the applicants' protection visa review; the Tribunal considered all evidence before it and the applicants were properly notified and given opportunity for submissions, but did not attend the hearing. No new grounds of appeal raised against the primary judge warranted leave and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'refugee Protection' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal accorded procedural fairness to the applicants' "Whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by jurisdictional error" 'Whether the Tribunal or primary judge made errors of law' 'Whether leave to rely on new grounds of appeal should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no jurisdictional error or lack of procedural fairness in the Tribunal's handling of the applicants' protection visa review; the Tribunal considered all evidence before it and the applicants were properly notified and given opportunity for submissions, but did not attend the hearing. No new grounds of appeal raised against the primary judge warranted leave and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellants pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment