Application of Philip Lewis Abigail [2002] NSWSC 556
The Court declined to answer the questions because the executor's concerns required determination of rights of interested persons, including the deceased's husband, infant beneficiaries and possibly the trustee in bankruptcy, and those rights should not be determined on an application for judicial advice under section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 without all persons with possible claims having an opportunity to be heard.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Executor for Judicial Advice Under Section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 Concerning Administration of Estate Assets / Judgment on Summons for Directions; Questions Declined and Leave Granted to Amend Summons and Join Additional Defendants
- Outcome
- The questions were not answered; leave was granted to amend the summons and join additional defendants; costs to date were made costs in the proceedings; proceedings stood over.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Advice to Trustees' 'construction and Administration of Will' 'life Insurance Policy Proceeds' 'infant Beneficiaries' 'undischarged Bankrupt Deceased Estate' 'joinder of Interested Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Executor for Judicial Advice Under Section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 Concerning Administration of Estate Assets / Judgment on Summons for Directions; Questions Declined and Leave Granted to Amend Summons and Join Additional Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceeds of life insurance policies formed part of the deceased's estate in light of section 48(4) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984." 'If the proceeds were not part of the estate, whether shares for minor nominated beneficiaries should be paid to their fathers or otherwise protected.' 'How the executor should deal with superannuation and death benefit moneys paid to him where the deceased was an undischarged bankrupt.' 'Whether the questions were appropriate for determination on an application for judicial advice under section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to answer the questions because the executor's concerns required determination of rights of interested persons, including the deceased's husband, infant beneficiaries and possibly the trustee in bankruptcy, and those rights should not be determined on an application for judicial advice under section 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 without all persons with possible claims having an opportunity to be heard.
Court Disposition
The questions were not answered; leave was granted to amend the summons and join additional defendants; costs to date were made costs in the proceedings; proceedings stood over.
Orders
- ['I decline to answer the questions asked in the Statement of Facts filed on 29 May 2002.' 'I grant leave to the Plaintiff to file an amended summons, and to join additional defendants to the proceedings.' 'I order that the costs of the proceedings to date be costs in the proceedings.' 'I stand the proceedings over...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment