Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand & Anor [2006] NSWCA 160
Legal professional privilege attaches to the legal opinion obtained by the trustee for the purpose of obtaining judicial advice under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) and is not abrogated either by the rules of natural justice or by placing the opinion before the Court on a confidential basis. No waiver of privilege occurs merely by providing the opinion to the Court in accordance with usual practice and on a confidential basis, and the non-adversarial character of s 63 proceedings means persons served with notice are not entitled to access privileged material. The primary judge erred in permitting partial access absent waiver.
- Parties
- Claimant: Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated; First Opponent: His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand; Second Opponent: The Very Reverend Father Mitko Mitrev
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Decision of Young CJ in Eq in the Supreme Court Equity Division
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; matter remitted to the Equity Division for determination; costs orders in favour of claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Advice to Trustees, Legal Professional Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Natural Justice, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated
Claimant
His Eminence Petar, the Diocesan Bishop of the Macedonian Orthodox Church of Australia and New Zealand
First Opponent
The Very Reverend Father Mitko Mitrev
Second Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Against Decision of Young CJ in Eq in the Supreme Court Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether, in an application for judicial advice under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), persons served under s 63(4) are entitled to access privileged legal opinion obtained by the trustee.
- 2 Whether legal professional privilege over the legal opinion was waived by the trustee submitting it to the Court.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal professional privilege attaches to the legal opinion obtained by the trustee for the purpose of obtaining judicial advice under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) and is not abrogated either by the rules of natural justice or by placing the opinion before the Court on a confidential basis. No waiver of privilege occurs merely by providing the opinion to the Court in accordance with usual practice and on a confidential basis, and the non-adversarial character of s 63 proceedings means persons served with notice are not entitled to access privileged material. The primary judge erred in permitting partial access absent waiver.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; matter remitted to the Equity Division for determination; costs orders in favour of claimant.
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Appeal allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment