Yushkova v Cook (Trustee), in the matter of the bankrupt estate of King (No 2) [2023] FCA 415
Given the unique circumstances where the judge has already decided and published reasons on the substantively identical factual and legal issues, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend a lack of impartiality; therefore, the judge should recuse himself to maintain public confidence in judicial neutrality.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Recusal Application and Interlocutory Procedural Management
- Outcome
- Judge recused; hearing adjourned for reallocation.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Bias' 'recusal' 'reasonable Apprehension of Bias' 'bankruptcy Trustees' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Recusal Application and Interlocutory Procedural Management
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the judge should recuse himself on the ground of reasonable apprehension of bias arising from prior determination of substantively identical issues in a stay application within the same proceeding']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unique circumstances where the judge has already decided and published reasons on the substantively identical factual and legal issues, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend a lack of impartiality; therefore, the judge should recuse himself to maintain public confidence in judicial neutrality.
Court Disposition
Judge recused; hearing adjourned for reallocation.
Orders
- ['The hearing of the appeal on 24 April 2023 be adjourned.' 'By 4:00 pm AEST on 3 May 2023, the Respondents file electronically a supplementary appeal book containing the affidavit evidence that was before the primary judge.' 'By 4:00 pm AEST on 5 June 2023, the Appellants file and serve a written outline of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment