R v McParland; R v Wingate (No 3) [2011] NSWDC 266
Although the accused was fit to be interviewed and gave articulate responses, his attempts to exercise his rights not to undergo the interview and to speak to a solicitor were overridden by the police, making it unfair to admit the interview evidence against him.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Accused: Troy McParland; Accused: Luke Wingate
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application to Tender Evidence at Trial
- Outcome
- Application to tender record of interview against accused Wingate refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence, Unfairness of Admitting Evidence, Right to Legal Representation, Right to Silence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Troy McParland
Accused
Luke Wingate
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Tender Evidence at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the record of interview with accused Wingate should be admitted into evidence
- 2 Whether admitting the interview would be unfair in the circumstances as per Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 85, 90, 135, 137
Ratio Decidendi
Although the accused was fit to be interviewed and gave articulate responses, his attempts to exercise his rights not to undergo the interview and to speak to a solicitor were overridden by the police, making it unfair to admit the interview evidence against him.
Court Disposition
Application to tender record of interview against accused Wingate refused.
Orders
- Record of interview not admitted into evidence against Luke Wingate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment