BUK16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 558
The proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court had no reasonable prospect of success, and the appellants' former solicitors expressly encouraged litigation without proper consideration of prospects. The preconditions for orders under s 486F were satisfied, and it was appropriate for the Court to order repayment of fees and costs by the solicitors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Trial Appeal From Judgment in Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'costs Orders' 'protection Visas' 'lawyer Obligations in Migration Litigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Trial Appeal From Judgment in Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the primary judge erred by failing to consider cost orders under s 486F of the Migration Act against the appellants' former solicitors" 'Whether this Court can and should make orders under s 486F in appellate jurisdiction' 'Whether the proceedings had no reasonable prospect of success and the lawyer contravened s 486E']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court had no reasonable prospect of success, and the appellants' former solicitors expressly encouraged litigation without proper consideration of prospects. The preconditions for orders under s 486F were satisfied, and it was appropriate for the Court to order repayment of fees and costs by the solicitors.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Order 2 made by Judge Dowdy on 20 November 2018 in FCCA proceedings SYG 1834/2016 is set aside.' 'Christopher Levingston & Associates Pty Ltd to pay costs incurred by the first respondent in FCCA proceedings SYG 1834/2016.' 'Christopher Levingston & Associates Pty Ltd to repay appellants the costs and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment