MZXKM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 636
The Federal Magistrate did not err in finding no reasonable excuse for non-attendance and that the application was out of time, and time could not be extended under s 477(1) of the Migration Act. There was no error of law warranting reconsideration.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'appeals' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error' 'time Limits']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a reasonable excuse for non-attendance at hearing' 'Whether the application for leave to appeal was filed within the statutory timeframe' 'Whether time could be extended for filing under s 477(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the decision was affected by jurisdictional error' 'Whether there was denial of procedural fairness or natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Magistrate did not err in finding no reasonable excuse for non-attendance and that the application was out of time, and time could not be extended under s 477(1) of the Migration Act. There was no error of law warranting reconsideration.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The description of the first respondent amended to 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'." "The applicants' application for leave to appeal refused." "The applicants to pay the first respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment