CHD18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 506
There was no illogicality or irrationality in the Authority's reasoning regarding the risk to the second appellant, nor did the Authority fail to consider any substantial component of the first appellant's claims. The conclusions reached were available on the evidence and consistent with the full assessment of country information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'legal Reasonableness' 'country Information Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Authority's decision regarding risk of harm to the second appellant was irrational, illogical, or legally unreasonable and thus affected by jurisdictional error" "Whether the Authority failed to consider an integer of the first appellant's claim for protection"]
Ratio Decidendi
There was no illogicality or irrationality in the Authority's reasoning regarding the risk to the second appellant, nor did the Authority fail to consider any substantial component of the first appellant's claims. The conclusions reached were available on the evidence and consistent with the full assessment of country information.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment