DMF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1953
The grounds of appeal did not identify any error on the part of the primary judge or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, as the Tribunal considered all relevant claims, gave reasoned findings, and complied with legal procedural requirements. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: DMF16; Second Appellant: DMG16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Apprehension of Bias, Credibility Findings, Procedural Fairness, Protection Visas
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DMF16
First Appellant
DMG16
Second Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by jurisdictional error
- 2 Whether apprehension of bias was present
- 3 Whether adverse credibility findings were legally unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal did not identify any error on the part of the primary judge or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, as the Tribunal considered all relevant claims, gave reasoned findings, and complied with legal procedural requirements. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellants pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment