Lewis & Anor v Registrar Consumer Claims Tribunal & Anor. [1999] NSWSC 381

Lewis & Anor v Registrar Consumer Claims Tribunal & Anor. [1999] NSWSC 381

The plaintiffs did not establish denial of natural justice. The refusal of an adjournment occurred in earlier discontinued proceedings and did not affect the subject proceedings, and the Tribunal's letter did not create a reasonable apprehension of bias. The referee's reasons addressed the substantive matters raised by the plaintiffs and s.34A did not require reference to every expert report or item of evidence. The challenge was in substance that the referee should have preferred the plaintiffs' evidence, not that there was no logically probative evidence to support the findings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 April 1999
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Proceedings Seeking to Set Aside a Consumer Claims Tribunal Determination and a Declaration of Denial of Natural Justice / Hearing of Summons in the Supreme Court of New South Wales Administrative Law Division
Outcome
Summons dismissed.
Legal Topics
['judicial Review of Consumer Claims Tribunal Order' 'denial of Natural Justice Under S.12(2)(b)(ii) of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987' 'no Evidence Rule' 'adequacy of Reasons Under S.34 a of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987' 'apprehended Bias' 'refusal of Adjournment']
['administrative Law' 'consumer Claims' 'natural Justice'] ['judicial Review of Consumer Claims Tribunal Order' 'denial of Natural Justice Under S.12(2)(b)(ii) of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987' 'no Evidence Rule' 'adequacy of Reasons Under S.34 a of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987' 'apprehended Bias' 'refusal of Adjournment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law Proceedings Seeking to Set Aside a Consumer Claims Tribunal Determination and a Declaration of Denial of Natural Justice / Hearing of Summons in the Supreme Court of New South Wales Administrative Law Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs were denied natural justice in the Consumer Claims Tribunal proceedings within the meaning of s.12(2)(b)(ii) of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987.' 'Whether the referee made findings without logically probative evidence.' "Whether the referee's reasons were so inadequate as not to satisfy s.34A of the Consumer Claims Tribunals Act 1987." "Whether refusal of an adjournment in earlier discontinued proceedings or the Tribunal's letter gave rise to denial of natural justice or a reasonable apprehension of bias."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiffs did not establish denial of natural justice. The refusal of an adjournment occurred in earlier discontinued proceedings and did not affect the subject proceedings, and the Tribunal's letter did not create a reasonable apprehension of bias. The referee's reasons addressed the substantive matters raised by the plaintiffs and s.34A did not require reference to every expert report or item of evidence. The challenge was in substance that the referee should have preferred the plaintiffs' evidence, not that there was no logically probative evidence to support the findings.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The Summons is dismissed.' 'The stay of enforcement of the judgment of the Consumer Claims Tribunal in respect of the subject proceedings granted on 15th October 1998 is set aside.']