Corlette P.J.C. & anor v Mackenzie R. & ors [1995] FCA 684
Section 265 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) confers a discretionary power, not a mandatory obligation, on the Taxation Relief Board to grant relief from tax liability; the Board validly exercised its discretion based on the existence of other debts and did not act unreasonably or inflexibly. Extension of time for review of the first decision was properly refused due to unexplained and substantial delay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Administrative Decisions' 'income Tax Liability' 'discretion to Release Taxpayers' 'extension of Time for Judicial Review' 'wednesbury Unreasonableness' 'application of Administrative Policy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Taxation Relief Board had power to grant relief under s 265 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)' 'Whether the power under s 265 is mandatory or discretionary' 'Whether extension of time for review of first decision should be granted' "Whether the Board's decision was unreasonable (Wednesbury unreasonableness)" 'Whether the Board applied an inflexible policy inconsistent with the statute']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 265 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) confers a discretionary power, not a mandatory obligation, on the Taxation Relief Board to grant relief from tax liability; the Board validly exercised its discretion based on the existence of other debts and did not act unreasonably or inflexibly. Extension of time for review of the first decision was properly refused due to unexplained and substantial delay.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment