Patel v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 501
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the grounds did not raise any arguable case of relevant error, and there was no doubt as to the correctness of the earlier decisions; the absence of an approved nomination meant a critical visa criterion was not met, so the review and appeal failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs awarded against first and second applicants.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review of Migration Decisions' 'leave to Appeal' 'requirements for Subclass 187 Visa' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was an arguable case of jurisdictional error by the Tribunal' 'Whether grounds for leave to appeal were sufficiently particularised and substantial' 'Whether the requirements for Subclass 187 visa were met, specifically relating to nomination withdrawal']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as the grounds did not raise any arguable case of relevant error, and there was no doubt as to the correctness of the earlier decisions; the absence of an approved nomination meant a critical visa criterion was not met, so the review and appeal failed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs awarded against first and second applicants.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The first and second applicants pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment