Jessica Investments Pty Ltd & Ors & Anor v Wood & Ors [2004] NSWSC 328
In light of s.109(3) of the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW), the Supreme Court is not deprived of jurisdiction to determine these proceedings, and there is insufficient reason to either strike out or stay the proceedings in favour of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (application to Strike Out or Stay Proceedings) / Interlocutory (decision on Application to Strike Out or Stay Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction' 'summary Dismissal' 'stay of Proceedings' 'community Schemes' 'community Land Management Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (application to Strike Out or Stay Proceedings) / Interlocutory (decision on Application to Strike Out or Stay Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to determine matters arising out of community schemes under the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW)' 'Whether the proceedings should be stayed or struck out because the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal is a more appropriate forum']
Ratio Decidendi
In light of s.109(3) of the Community Land Management Act 1989 (NSW), the Supreme Court is not deprived of jurisdiction to determine these proceedings, and there is insufficient reason to either strike out or stay the proceedings in favour of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment