OnePath Life Limited, Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited and Suncorp Life and Superannuation Limited v NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages and Gerasimov [2013] NSWADT 196
The Tribunal found that although a duly made internal review application had not occurred, s 55(3) of the ADT Act confers a dispensing power permitting the Tribunal to hear a review application even in the absence of a prior internal review, making the jurisdictional objection unsuccessful. However, given parallel District Court proceedings on the substantive issue (death benefit claims), there is no utility in proceeding at this time, and the Tribunal stayed the review until those proceedings are resolved.
- Parties
- First Applicant: OnePath Life Limited; Second Applicant: Allianz Australia Life Insurance Ltd; Third Applicant: Suncorp Life and Superannuation Ltd; First Respondent: NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages; Second Respondent: Sergy Gerasimov
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Application for Review, Jurisdictional Objection Raised, Stayed Pending District Court Outcome
- Outcome
- Second respondent's jurisdictional objection rejected; application for review stayed pending District Court outcome.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Application for Review, Internal Review Requirements, Case Management, Effect of Death Certificates, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OnePath Life Limited
First Applicant
Allianz Australia Life Insurance Ltd
Second Applicant
Suncorp Life and Superannuation Ltd
Third Applicant
NSW Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages
First Respondent
Sergy Gerasimov
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Application for Review, Jurisdictional Objection Raised, Stayed Pending District Court Outcome
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider review application absent an orthodox internal review
- 2 Whether pre-conditions to review (internal review) were satisfied
- 3 Whether there is utility in the Tribunal proceeding while related District Court proceedings are ongoing
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that although a duly made internal review application had not occurred, s 55(3) of the ADT Act confers a dispensing power permitting the Tribunal to hear a review application even in the absence of a prior internal review, making the jurisdictional objection unsuccessful. However, given parallel District Court proceedings on the substantive issue (death benefit claims), there is no utility in proceeding at this time, and the Tribunal stayed the review until those proceedings are resolved.
Court Disposition
Second respondent's jurisdictional objection rejected; application for review stayed pending District Court outcome.
Orders
- The second respondent's objection to jurisdiction is rejected.
- The application for review is stayed pending resolution of the District Court proceedings brought by the second respondent against the insurers (matters numbered 2011/00292705, 2011/00301247, 2011/00304114).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment