SXPB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1110
The RRT did not commit any jurisdictional error in finding that the Albanian government was able and willing to provide an acceptable level of protection to the second applicant. There was evidence to support the finding that the level of protection was not below international standards. The application should be dismissed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: SXPB; Second Applicant: SXQB; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Federal Court Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdictional Error, Refugee Protection, State Protection, Particular Social Group
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SXPB
First Applicant
SXQB
Second Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Federal Court Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal made a jurisdictional error in determining that the second applicant could be afforded an acceptable level of protection by the Albanian government
Ratio Decidendi
The RRT did not commit any jurisdictional error in finding that the Albanian government was able and willing to provide an acceptable level of protection to the second applicant. There was evidence to support the finding that the level of protection was not below international standards. The application should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent to these proceedings.
- The application be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment