Can, Lu v. Martin, Robyn & Anor [1995] FCA 533
A Commissioner of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, when acting as a Grievance Board under clause 33 of the relevant Award, is an officer of the Commonwealth for the purposes of s75(v) of the Constitution and therefore amenable to judicial review by this Court. Clause 33 of the Award empowers the grievance board to resolve disputes including those involving dismissal, and this extends to the power to order reinstatement in appropriate cases where the original industrial dispute encompasses such remedies.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review (writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition) / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Industrial Grievance Board' 'officer of the Commonwealth Under S75(v) Constitution' 'award Interpretation' 'power to Order Reinstatement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review (writs of Certiorari, Mandamus and Prohibition) / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a Commissioner acting as a Grievance Board under an award is an officer of the Commonwealth for the purpose of s75(v) of the Constitution' 'Whether the Grievance Board has jurisdiction and power to order reinstatement under clause 33 of the Award']
Ratio Decidendi
A Commissioner of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, when acting as a Grievance Board under clause 33 of the relevant Award, is an officer of the Commonwealth for the purposes of s75(v) of the Constitution and therefore amenable to judicial review by this Court. Clause 33 of the Award empowers the grievance board to resolve disputes including those involving dismissal, and this extends to the power to order reinstatement in appropriate cases where the original industrial dispute encompasses such remedies.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition be dismissed.' 'The order nisi made by Lee J. on 16 February 1995 be discharged.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment