Rowell, Anthony Roland v Child, Douglas Braddon [1983] FCA 129
Sections 147 and 191 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 do not evince an intention to displace the jurisdiction of State courts granted by s.39(2) of the Judiciary Act 1903. The Magistrates' Court had jurisdiction to convict and sentence the appellant for offences under s.171. However, under s.197A of the Act, the Magistrates' Court lacked power to order costs upon conviction, and such an order must be set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant (accused): Anthony Ronald Rowell; Respondent (informant): Douglas Braddon Child
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Appeals From Magistrates' Court and County Court Decisions Criminal Prosecution Under Federal Industrial Law / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal from County Court allowed; order of County Court set aside. Appeal from Magistrates' Court dismissed, but order varied to set aside order for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of State and Federal Courts, Summary Conviction, Interpretation of Statutes, Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction, Costs in Criminal Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Ronald Rowell
Appellant (accused)
Douglas Braddon Child
Respondent (informant)
Procedural Posture
Appeals From Magistrates' Court and County Court Decisions Criminal Prosecution Under Federal Industrial Law / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Magistrates' Court of Victoria had jurisdiction to hear and determine a prosecution for offences against s.171 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 2 Whether s.191 or s.147 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Federal Court to the exclusion of State courts
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 147 and 191 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 do not evince an intention to displace the jurisdiction of State courts granted by s.39(2) of the Judiciary Act 1903. The Magistrates' Court had jurisdiction to convict and sentence the appellant for offences under s.171. However, under s.197A of the Act, the Magistrates' Court lacked power to order costs upon conviction, and such an order must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal from County Court allowed; order of County Court set aside. Appeal from Magistrates' Court dismissed, but order varied to set aside order for costs.
Orders
- The appeal from the judgment of the County Court be allowed and the order therein set aside.
- The appeal from the Magistrates' Court order be dismissed, except that any order for costs is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment