Laurie v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council & Ors; New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Laurie & Ors (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 73
The remaining issue of whether the applicant has become disqualified from holding office since election and whether her position should be declared a casual vacancy arises directly from the findings and must be resolved, with pleadings to be amended to specify the date of alleged disqualification, in order to finally determine all matters in controversy as required by section 22.
- Parties
- Applicant/first Cross Defendant: Patricia Helen Laurie; First Respondent/cross Claimant: New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council; Second Respondent: Registrar, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983; Second Cross Defendant: Brian Decelis; Third Cross Defendant: Electoral Commissioner for New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Application and Cross Claim / Post Judgment; Determination of Outstanding Issues and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Further submissions and amendment of pleadings ordered; final orders deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction to Declare Elected Office Vacant, Pleadings Amendment, Aboriginal Land Rights Act, Remedies and Finality in Civil Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Helen Laurie
Applicant/first Cross Defendant
New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council
First Respondent/cross Claimant
Registrar, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983
Second Respondent
Brian Decelis
Second Cross Defendant
Electoral Commissioner for New South Wales
Third Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Application and Cross Claim / Post Judgment; Determination of Outstanding Issues and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether court should resolve all outstanding issues between parties, including disqualification and casual vacancy
- 2 Whether pleadings should be amended to specify date of alleged disqualification
- 3 Whether section 22 of the Land and Environment Court Act applies to require final determination
Ratio Decidendi
The remaining issue of whether the applicant has become disqualified from holding office since election and whether her position should be declared a casual vacancy arises directly from the findings and must be resolved, with pleadings to be amended to specify the date of alleged disqualification, in order to finally determine all matters in controversy as required by section 22.
Court Disposition
Further submissions and amendment of pleadings ordered; final orders deferred.
Orders
- NSWALC to amend pleadings to specify date of alleged disqualification/casual vacancy.
- Timetable for written submissions and oral argument set for outstanding issues including costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment