R v JH (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1966
The juror's internet search for images of the deceased and viewing of an image including the deceased's parents holding a photograph of him was an inquiry capable of obtaining information about a matter relevant to the trial, was not a proper exercise of the juror's functions, and was in breach of the judge's directions and s 68C of the Jury Act 1977. The image was extraneous material capable of eliciting strong emotion and had the potential to affect the juror's objective and impartial performance. The juror was therefore discharged pursuant to s 53B of the Jury Act 1977 and issued a certificate pursuant to s 55DA.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Procedural Ruling on Application to Discharge a Juror for Alleged Misconduct During Trial
- Outcome
- The juror was discharged from the jury and issued a certificate; the trial proceeded with the eleven remaining jurors.
- Legal Topics
- ['juror Misconduct' 'internet Research by Juror' 'discharge of Juror' 'extraneous Material' 'fair Trial by Impartial Jury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Procedural Ruling on Application to Discharge a Juror for Alleged Misconduct During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a juror's internet search for a photograph of the deceased constituted an inquiry for the purpose of obtaining information about the accused or any matters relevant to the trial within s 68C of the Jury Act 1977." "Whether the juror's conduct amounted to misconduct or otherwise affected the juror's ability to perform the functions of a juror so that the juror should be discharged." 'Whether a direction to the jury would be sufficient instead of discharging the juror.']
Ratio Decidendi
The juror's internet search for images of the deceased and viewing of an image including the deceased's parents holding a photograph of him was an inquiry capable of obtaining information about a matter relevant to the trial, was not a proper exercise of the juror's functions, and was in breach of the judge's directions and s 68C of the Jury Act 1977. The image was extraneous material capable of eliciting strong emotion and had the potential to affect the juror's objective and impartial performance. The juror was therefore discharged pursuant to s 53B of the Jury Act 1977 and issued a certificate pursuant to s 55DA.
Court Disposition
The juror was discharged from the jury and issued a certificate; the trial proceeded with the eleven remaining jurors.
Orders
- ['The juror be discharged from the jury pursuant to s 53B of the Jury Act 1977.' 'The juror be issued a certificate pursuant to s 55DA of the Jury Act 1977.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment