Regina v Ronen & Ors [2005] NSWSC 320
In the wholly unusual circumstances of the trial, including its length, factual and accounting complexity, expense, the inordinate expense to the community and the accused if it had to start afresh, its likely conclusion within about a week, and the absence of opposition from the accused, the discretion should be exercised to allow the trial to continue with the remaining 10 jurors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Jury Trial / Application During Trial to Continue With Remaining Jurors After Discharge of a Juror
- Outcome
- Application granted; trial to continue with 10 jurors.
- Legal Topics
- ['jury Act S 22' 'discharge of Juror' 'continuation of Trial With Fewer Than 12 Jurors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Jury Trial / Application During Trial to Continue With Remaining Jurors After Discharge of a Juror
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should order that the remaining 10 jurors be considered as remaining for all purposes of the trial and allow the trial to continue with fewer than 12 jurors.']
Ratio Decidendi
In the wholly unusual circumstances of the trial, including its length, factual and accounting complexity, expense, the inordinate expense to the community and the accused if it had to start afresh, its likely conclusion within about a week, and the absence of opposition from the accused, the discretion should be exercised to allow the trial to continue with the remaining 10 jurors.
Court Disposition
Application granted; trial to continue with 10 jurors.
Orders
- ['The remaining 10 jurors are to be considered as remaining for all purposes of the trial properly constituted as the jury.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment