R v Chalabian (No. 10) [2022] NSWSC 316
The juror is required to self-isolate due to a household member testing positive for COVID-19 and is not a 'critical worker' exempt under relevant public health orders. The juror cannot perform the functions required and must be discharged under s.53B(d) Jury Act 1977. The trial can proceed with 12 jurors as per s.53C.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Jury Trial / Procedural Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- Juror G discharged; trial to continue with 12 jurors.
- Legal Topics
- ['jury Discharge' 'covid 19' 'jury Act 1977' 'critical Worker Exemption']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Jury Trial / Procedural Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an absent juror required to self-isolate due to COVID-19 exposure may continue to serve on the jury' "Whether members of a jury are 'critical workers' under Public Health (COVID-19 Self-Isolation) Order 2022" 'Whether the trial may continue with 12 remaining jurors']
Ratio Decidendi
The juror is required to self-isolate due to a household member testing positive for COVID-19 and is not a 'critical worker' exempt under relevant public health orders. The juror cannot perform the functions required and must be discharged under s.53B(d) Jury Act 1977. The trial can proceed with 12 jurors as per s.53C.
Court Disposition
Juror G discharged; trial to continue with 12 jurors.
Orders
- ['Juror G is discharged under s.53B(d) Jury Act 1977.' 'The trial of the Accused is to continue with a jury of 12.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment