R v Khayat (No 12) [2019] NSWSC 1321
Because the jury notes, observed apprehension among jurors and reported abusive remarks showed undue disharmony and fear of recrimination within the jury, and because the Crown's case was a relatively complex circumstantial case requiring each juror to apply themselves without distraction, there was a high degree of necessity in the interests of justice to discharge the whole jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Fifth Day of Trial; Accused's Application to Discharge the Whole Jury
- Outcome
- Whole jury discharged.
- Legal Topics
- ['jury Discharge' 'inherent Jurisdiction' 'juror Disharmony' 'fair Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Fifth Day of Trial; Accused's Application to Discharge the Whole Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the whole jury should be discharged because disharmony and fear of potential recrimination among jurors were distracting from the jury's task in a complex circumstantial case."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the jury notes, observed apprehension among jurors and reported abusive remarks showed undue disharmony and fear of recrimination within the jury, and because the Crown's case was a relatively complex circumstantial case requiring each juror to apply themselves without distraction, there was a high degree of necessity in the interests of justice to discharge the whole jury.
Court Disposition
Whole jury discharged.
Orders
- ['Discharge the whole jury.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment