R v Finley [2016] NSWSC 327
Given the juror’s prior knowledge and positive assessment of the deceased and his mother, as well as her communication of those assessments to the other jurors, both the individual juror and then the entire jury were discharged to avoid risk of substantial miscarriage of justice, particularly given the gravity of the charges and the centrality of credibility assessments.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Jury Discharge Ruling Prior to Trial Continuation
- Outcome
- Individual juror and remainder of the jury discharged; trial to recommence with a new jury.
- Legal Topics
- ['jury Discharge' 'juror Impartiality' 'contaminated Jury' 'criminal Trial Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Jury Discharge Ruling Prior to Trial Continuation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an individual juror should be discharged for prior knowledge and assessments of parties involved in the trial' "Whether the remainder of the jury should be discharged due to contamination by a juror's statements"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the juror’s prior knowledge and positive assessment of the deceased and his mother, as well as her communication of those assessments to the other jurors, both the individual juror and then the entire jury were discharged to avoid risk of substantial miscarriage of justice, particularly given the gravity of the charges and the centrality of credibility assessments.
Court Disposition
Individual juror and remainder of the jury discharged; trial to recommence with a new jury.
Orders
- ['An individual juror is discharged.' 'The remainder of the jury is discharged.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment