R v Sun [2021] NSWDC 574
Due to COVID-19 restrictions on the number of people allowed in the jury room and administrative arrangements binding the court to comply with these restrictions despite statutory exemption, the court exercised discretion under s 53B(c) Jury Act 1977 to discharge three of the fifteen empanelled jurors and reduce the jury to twelve using a ballot process.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Accused: Young Hoon Sun
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial—interlocutory Determination on the Composition of the Jury
- Outcome
- Order for reduction of jury via ballot under s 53B(c) Jury Act 1977; three jurors to be discharged by ballot, resulting in a panel of twelve.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Discharge, COVID 19 Restrictions and Court Proceedings, Jury Act 1977 Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
Young Hoon Sun
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial—interlocutory Determination on the Composition of the Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should discharge part or all of the expanded jury due to COVID-19 restrictions on room capacity
- 2 Whether s 53B Jury Act 1977 allows for the discharge of multiple jurors for practical or administrative reasons
- 3 How conflicting legislative and administrative requirements affect jury management during a criminal trial
Ratio Decidendi
Due to COVID-19 restrictions on the number of people allowed in the jury room and administrative arrangements binding the court to comply with these restrictions despite statutory exemption, the court exercised discretion under s 53B(c) Jury Act 1977 to discharge three of the fifteen empanelled jurors and reduce the jury to twelve using a ballot process.
Court Disposition
Order for reduction of jury via ballot under s 53B(c) Jury Act 1977; three jurors to be discharged by ballot, resulting in a panel of twelve.
Orders
- There shall be a ballot for a jury of 12 by placing all identification cards of the expanded jury into a ballot box and drawing out cards until 12 persons are selected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment