R v Pirrello, Pirrello & D’Agostino (No. 10) [2019] NSWSC 1837
There is no risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice in continuing the trial with the remaining ten jurors, given their demonstrated attentiveness, the advanced stage of the trial, and the absence of factors indicating unfairness. The court refused the application to discharge the whole jury and the trial will continue.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Joseph D'Agostino; Accused: Michael Pirrello; Accused: Francesco Pirrello
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Interlocutory Application During Trial
- Outcome
- Application to discharge jury refused; trial to continue
- Legal Topics
- Jury Discharge, Conspiracy to Import Border Controlled Drugs, Substantial Miscarriage of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Joseph D'Agostino
Accused
Michael Pirrello
Accused
Francesco Pirrello
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Interlocutory Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial should continue with ten jurors after the discharge of a single juror
- 2 Whether continuing presents a risk of substantial miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
There is no risk of a substantial miscarriage of justice in continuing the trial with the remaining ten jurors, given their demonstrated attentiveness, the advanced stage of the trial, and the absence of factors indicating unfairness. The court refused the application to discharge the whole jury and the trial will continue.
Court Disposition
Application to discharge jury refused; trial to continue
Orders
- The trial will continue with ten jurors pursuant to s 53C(1)(b) of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment