R v HAOUI [2007] NSWDC 6
The judge ruled that it was appropriate and practicable to provide the jury with a transcript of the evidence because it would assist them in their deliberations without undermining the proper conduct of the trial. The right of the accused to have things happen in his presence does not extend to the jury's internal deliberations, and supplying the transcript is consistent with statutory provision and common sense.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Crown; Accused: Joseph Robert HAOUI
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / During Trial; Ruling on Jury Request for Transcript
- Outcome
- The jury is to be provided with copies of the transcript of evidence as requested.
- Legal Topics
- Jury Procedure, Supply of Transcript to Jury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown
Prosecution
Joseph Robert HAOUI
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / During Trial; Ruling on Jury Request for Transcript
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the jury be provided with a transcript of the evidence upon request during the trial?
Ratio Decidendi
The judge ruled that it was appropriate and practicable to provide the jury with a transcript of the evidence because it would assist them in their deliberations without undermining the proper conduct of the trial. The right of the accused to have things happen in his presence does not extend to the jury's internal deliberations, and supplying the transcript is consistent with statutory provision and common sense.
Court Disposition
The jury is to be provided with copies of the transcript of evidence as requested.
Orders
- Jury to be provided with transcript of evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment