R v Friese [2022] NSWDC 428
No sentence other than imprisonment was appropriate, but the offending was in the low range of objective seriousness, the offender had no prior convictions, was of prior good character, was unlikely to reoffend, had good rehabilitation prospects, demonstrated remorse, and his deprived upbringing and psychiatric conditions reduced moral culpability and moderated the need for deterrence and denunciation. Special circumstances existed because this was his first time in custody, custody was more onerous due to Covid and psychiatric conditions, and he required a longer period on parole-like supervision for rehabilitation. Community safety did not require full-time custody and an Intensive...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas to Two Counts and Admission of Form 1 Matters
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 14 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order commencing 26 September 2022 and ending 25 November 2023. Cash in the approximate sum of $6,943 was forfeited to the State. Sequences 5, 7 and 9 were withdrawn and dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['knowingly Taking Part in Cultivation of Prohibited Plants by Enhanced Indoor Means' 'cannabis Cultivation' 'form 1 Offences' 'intensive Corrections Order' 'forfeiture of Suspected Proceeds of Crime' 'parity' 'mitigating Factors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Pleas to Two Counts and Admission of Form 1 Matters
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for two counts of knowingly taking part in the cultivation of cannabis by enhanced indoor means where additional offences were admitted on a Form 1.' "Whether the offending fell within the low range of objective seriousness having regard to the number of plants, sophistication of the cultivation systems and the offender's role." "Whether the offender's deprived upbringing and psychiatric conditions reduced moral culpability and moderated deterrence and denunciation." 'Whether special circumstances existed and whether the sentence of imprisonment should be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order.' 'Whether parity with co-offenders affected the sentence.']
Ratio Decidendi
No sentence other than imprisonment was appropriate, but the offending was in the low range of objective seriousness, the offender had no prior convictions, was of prior good character, was unlikely to reoffend, had good rehabilitation prospects, demonstrated remorse, and his deprived upbringing and psychiatric conditions reduced moral culpability and moderated the need for deterrence and denunciation. Special circumstances existed because this was his first time in custody, custody was more onerous due to Covid and psychiatric conditions, and he required a longer period on parole-like supervision for rehabilitation. Community safety did not require full-time custody and an Intensive...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 14 months to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order commencing 26 September 2022 and ending 25 November 2023. Cash in the approximate sum of $6,943 was forfeited to the State. Sequences 5, 7 and 9 were withdrawn and dismissed.
Orders
- ['Conviction recorded.' 'Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 14 months imposed and directed to be served by way of an Intensive Corrections Order commencing 26 September 2022 and ending 25 November 2023.' 'The offender must not commit any offence.' 'The offender must submit to supervision by a Community...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment