Dwyer v Department of Justice and Attorney General (NSW) [2017] NSWCATCD 15
The landlord breached s. 63 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 by failing to repair or replace the leaking lounge room air conditioner after having notice of the defect since the commencement of the tenancy and failing to act with reasonable diligence. The leaking air conditioner affected the fitness for habitation but did not render the premises uninhabitable. The tenant was therefore entitled to a repair or replacement order, compensation for loss of amenity, and a limited rent abatement, but not the full rent reductions or general upgrade of air conditioning sought.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Application / Principal Judgment; Written Reasons Following Ex Tempore Decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- ['landlord Repair Obligations' 'rent Reduction' 'compensation for Loss of Amenity' 'fitness for Habitation' 'air Conditioning in Residential Premises']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Application / Principal Judgment; Written Reasons Following Ex Tempore Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the landlord was required to repair or replace the leaking lounge room air conditioner.' 'Whether the tenant was entitled to compensation or rent reduction for the unavailability of a serviceable air conditioner in the lounge room.' 'Whether the premises were uninhabitable because the air conditioners were inadequate during hot weather in Bourke.' 'Whether the landlord had reduced or withdrawn goods, services or facilities provided with the residential premises.']
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord breached s. 63 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 by failing to repair or replace the leaking lounge room air conditioner after having notice of the defect since the commencement of the tenancy and failing to act with reasonable diligence. The leaking air conditioner affected the fitness for habitation but did not render the premises uninhabitable. The tenant was therefore entitled to a repair or replacement order, compensation for loss of amenity, and a limited rent abatement, but not the full rent reductions or general upgrade of air conditioning sought.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part.
Orders
- ['The name of the respondent is amended to: Department of Justice and Attorney General (NSW).' 'The respondent is to repair or replace the air conditioner in the lounge room of the premises by 23 February 2017.' 'The respondent is to pay the tenant the sum of $300.00 on or before 8 March 2017, on account of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment