R v SCOTT [2019] NSWDC 526
The seriousness of three separate incidents, including domestic violence offending in breach of an order, intimidation with a firearm, armed offending in company at a family home, multiple victims, offending while on bail and on a bond, and the offender's prior record required a substantial custodial aggregate sentence. Partial accumulation was necessary to reflect separate criminality, but totality, the offender's deprived background, psychological issues, rehabilitation needs, late pleas, parity considerations and special circumstances justified an aggregate sentence of seven years and three months with a non-parole period of four years and three months and a three-year parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas Entered During Trial and Before a Further Listed Trial
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of seven years and three months imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years and three months, commencing on 8 June 2018; eligible for consideration for release to parole on 7 September 2022; total sentence to expire on 7 September 2025.
- Legal Topics
- ['late Guilty Plea' 'multiple Incidents' 'firearms and Offensive Weapons' 'intimidation' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'demand Money in Company With Menaces With Intent to Steal' 'breach of Apprehended Violence Order' 'accumulation and Concurrence' 'totality' 'parity' 'special Circumstances' 'rehabilitation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas Entered During Trial and Before a Further Listed Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence should be imposed for offences arising from the Lake Illawarra, Cringila and Woonona incidents.' 'How the court should assess objective seriousness where multiple victims were affected, a firearm and knife were used, offending occurred at a home, and domestic violence offending occurred in breach of an order.' "What weight should be given to late guilty pleas, the offender's criminal history, offending while on bail and on a bond, deprived background, drug use, rehabilitation prospects, victim requests for mercy, parity with the co-offender, and special circumstances." 'How accumulation, concurrence and totality should be applied across multiple offences and incidents.']
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of three separate incidents, including domestic violence offending in breach of an order, intimidation with a firearm, armed offending in company at a family home, multiple victims, offending while on bail and on a bond, and the offender's prior record required a substantial custodial aggregate sentence. Partial accumulation was necessary to reflect separate criminality, but totality, the offender's deprived background, psychological issues, rehabilitation needs, late pleas, parity considerations and special circumstances justified an aggregate sentence of seven years and three months with a non-parole period of four years and three months and a three-year parole period.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of seven years and three months imprisonment with a non-parole period of four years and three months, commencing on 8 June 2018; eligible for consideration for release to parole on 7 September 2022; total sentence to expire on 7 September 2025.
Orders
- ['For damage property, s 195 offence, an indicated sentence of 11 months.' 'For stalk and intimidate, s 13 offence, an indicated sentence of one year and ten months.' 'For using an offensive weapon with intent, s 33B(1)(a) offence at Cringila, an indicated sentence of two years and ten months.' 'For use offensive...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment