Doman v Young Scholars @Glebe Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1266
The landlord failed to establish a valid market rent review occurred or entitlement to various outgoings claimed; the tenant failed to establish that water damage substantially adversely affected its use of the premises and cannot rely on an unpleaded adjustment provision. Judgment is for the plaintiffs for a money sum to be calculated excluding claims not proved and offset by recovery under the bank guarantee.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: Thomas Alastair Doman; Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant: Elspeth Mary Doman; Third Plaintiff/third Cross Defendant: T A Doman & Co Pty Limited; Fourth Plaintiff/fourth Cross Defendant: Vimreach Pty Ltd; Fifth Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant: Margaret Campbell Doman; First Defendant/cross Claimant: Young Scholars @Glebe Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Joan Elizabeth Stone; Third Defendant: Cubbyhouse Childcare NSW Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Determination After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants for a money sum to be calculated as per reasons, accounting for recovery under bank guarantee.
- Legal Topics
- Leases and Tenancies, Unpaid Rent, Loss of Bargain Damages, Abatement of Rent, Termination for Breach
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Alastair Doman
First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant
Elspeth Mary Doman
Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant
T A Doman & Co Pty Limited
Third Plaintiff/third Cross Defendant
Vimreach Pty Ltd
Fourth Plaintiff/fourth Cross Defendant
Margaret Campbell Doman
Fifth Plaintiff/fifth Cross Defendant
Young Scholars @Glebe Pty Ltd
First Defendant/cross Claimant
Joan Elizabeth Stone
Second Defendant
Cubbyhouse Childcare NSW Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Determination After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord is entitled to unpaid rent, outgoings, and loss of bargain damages on termination of lease for tenant's breach
- 2 Whether tenant is entitled to abatement of rent due to water ingress and damage affecting premises
- 3 Whether landlord's claim for rent can be predicated on a market rent review
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord failed to establish a valid market rent review occurred or entitlement to various outgoings claimed; the tenant failed to establish that water damage substantially adversely affected its use of the premises and cannot rely on an unpleaded adjustment provision. Judgment is for the plaintiffs for a money sum to be calculated excluding claims not proved and offset by recovery under the bank guarantee.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the defendants for a money sum to be calculated as per reasons, accounting for recovery under bank guarantee.
Orders
- The parties are to bring in short minutes reflecting this outcome, including any amounts payable for pre-judgment interest.
- The parties are to draw to the Court's attention any further issues (other than costs) which remain to be determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment