City X-Ray Pty Ltd v Rigby Hall Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 222

City X-Ray Pty Ltd v Rigby Hall Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 222

City X-Ray failed to establish any breach of contract by Rigby Hall in calling on the bank guarantee or incurring make-good costs, as the evidence showed Rigby Hall acted reasonably in the process, scope, and cost of works undertaken. City X-Ray was in breach of its make-good obligations under the lease, and the absence of a 2006 condition report did not materially contribute to or excuse that breach. Rigby Hall’s cross-claim for damages, offset by the bank guarantee amount already received, succeeded.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Judgment for defendant on plaintiff's claim (claim dismissed); judgment for defendant/cross-claimant on cross-claim for damages plus interest.
Legal Topics
['leases and Tenancies' 'obligation to Make Good on Termination' 'bank Guarantee Under Lease' 'breach of Lease' 'cross Claim for Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 ['Whether the landlord (Rigby Hall) breached the lease by calling upon the full amount of a bank guarantee' 'Whether the tenant (City X-Ray) failed to comply with make-good obligations under the lease' 'Whether costs incurred by the landlord in undertaking make-good works were reasonable under the lease' 'Effect of absence of a condition report at commencement of tenancy']

Ratio Decidendi

City X-Ray failed to establish any breach of contract by Rigby Hall in calling on the bank guarantee or incurring make-good costs, as the evidence showed Rigby Hall acted reasonably in the process, scope, and cost of works undertaken. City X-Ray was in breach of its make-good obligations under the lease, and the absence of a 2006 condition report did not materially contribute to or excuse that breach. Rigby Hall’s cross-claim for damages, offset by the bank guarantee amount already received, succeeded.

Court Disposition

Judgment for defendant on plaintiff's claim (claim dismissed); judgment for defendant/cross-claimant on cross-claim for damages plus interest.

Orders

  • ["Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff on the plaintiff's claim and the claim is dismissed." 'Judgment for the defendant/cross-claimant against the plaintiff/cross-defendant on the cross-claim in the sum of $149,387.38 plus interest.']