ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (formerly Vale Pty Ltd) v S& P Global, Inc [2020] FCA 1745
The applicants, in particular Cockburn, established a prima facie case that S&P’s assignment of AA ratings to CDOs (including the Aramis CDO) and the representations of independence and objectivity in those ratings were misleading or dishonest in breach of s 1041F(1)(a) and (b) of the Corporations Act. S&P’s business considerations influenced the ratings process, contrary to representations. Cockburn relied on the representations and suffered loss in Australia. The Federal Court thereby granted leave for service of originating process on overseas respondents under r 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
- Parties
- First Applicant: ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (formerly Vale Pty Ltd); Second Applicant: City of Cockburn ABN 27 471 341 209; First Respondent: S&P Global, Inc.; Second Respondent: Standard & Poor's International, LLC
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding (class Action) / Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Outside Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Leave to serve originating application, statement of claim, and amended interlocutory application on the respondents in the United States granted.
- Legal Topics
- Leave for Service Outside Jurisdiction, Contravention of S 1041 F Corporations Act, Tort of Deceit, Credit Ratings, Prima Facie Case Requirement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (formerly Vale Pty Ltd)
First Applicant
City of Cockburn ABN 27 471 341 209
Second Applicant
S&P Global, Inc.
First Respondent
Standard & Poor's International, LLC
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding (class Action) / Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Outside Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants demonstrated a prima facie case for leave to serve originating process on foreign respondents under r 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
- 2 Whether applicants established a prima facie case of contravention of s 1041F of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the tort of deceit against S&P
- 3 Whether S&P's representations as to credit ratings and their independence were misleading, false, or deceptive and induced investment in CDOs
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants, in particular Cockburn, established a prima facie case that S&P’s assignment of AA ratings to CDOs (including the Aramis CDO) and the representations of independence and objectivity in those ratings were misleading or dishonest in breach of s 1041F(1)(a) and (b) of the Corporations Act. S&P’s business considerations influenced the ratings process, contrary to representations. Cockburn relied on the representations and suffered loss in Australia. The Federal Court thereby granted leave for service of originating process on overseas respondents under r 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Court Disposition
Leave to serve originating application, statement of claim, and amended interlocutory application on the respondents in the United States granted.
Orders
- Applicants have leave to serve the originating application, statement of claim, and amended interlocutory application on the respondents in the United States under the Hague Convention.
- Suppression order: paragraphs 119–121 of the affidavit of Ross Garland sworn on 25 November 2020 and exhibit RG3 to that affidavit are to be suppressed to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment