Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2022] FCA 196
The applicants failed to demonstrate a reasonably arguable case of appealable error or substantial injustice resulting from refusal of leave. The Tribunal’s findings regarding false or misleading information were open based on the evidence, and procedural obligations were met. There was insufficient merit to warrant reinstatement or leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'visa Refusal' 'false or Misleading Information' 'procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from an interlocutory order refusing reinstatement of judicial review application' 'Whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused' "Whether the Tribunal's decision was unreasonable or affected by appealable error" 'Whether applicants were denied procedural fairness']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to demonstrate a reasonably arguable case of appealable error or substantial injustice resulting from refusal of leave. The Tribunal’s findings regarding false or misleading information were open based on the evidence, and procedural obligations were met. There was insufficient merit to warrant reinstatement or leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal filed on 19 September 2019 be refused.' "The applicants pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment