Frigger v Trenfield (No 5) [2022] FCA 531
The interests of justice required adjournment of the application for leave to amend the originating application, pending determination of proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, as the substantive position had not sufficiently changed since a prior adjournment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Amend Originating Application / Case Management Hearing; Interlocutory Stage
- Outcome
- Application adjourned to a date to be fixed
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Amend Originating Application' 'adjournment' 'sequestration Orders' 'bankruptcy' 'damages for Alleged Malicious Prosecution' 'civil Conspiracy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Amend Originating Application / Case Management Hearing; Interlocutory Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be given to amend the originating application' 'Whether the hearing should be adjourned pending determination of related proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia']
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of justice required adjournment of the application for leave to amend the originating application, pending determination of proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, as the substantive position had not sufficiently changed since a prior adjournment.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned to a date to be fixed
Orders
- ['Leave granted for applicants to file the affidavit of Angela Cecilia Frigger and submissions.' 'Hearing of whether leave should be granted to amend originating application adjourned to a date to be fixed.' 'Costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment