Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu (No 2) [2018] FCA 1583

Beijing Hua Xin Liu He Investment (Australia) Pty Ltd v Lu (No 2) [2018] FCA 1583

Leave to amend the statement of claim is granted because the delay was adequately explained, the amendments provide sufficient clarity for the respondents to plead to, there is no undue prejudice as the matter is not close to trial, and the proposed amendments are not, on their face, futile or bound to fail. Case management principles justify permitting the matter to proceed with clarified pleadings, supported by directions for discovery and further particulars.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application (leave to Amend Statement of Claim) / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim Prior to Trial
Outcome
Leave to amend granted; directions given for amended pleadings, particulars, discovery, and costs.
Legal Topics
['leave to Amend Pleadings' 'statement of Claim' 'case Management' 'delay' 'particulars']
['practice and Procedure'] ['leave to Amend Pleadings' 'statement of Claim' 'case Management' 'delay' 'particulars']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application (leave to Amend Statement of Claim) / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the statement of claim given the delay and objections raised' "Whether the applicant's proposed amendments are untenable or futile" 'Whether case management principles, including delay and prejudice, justify refusal of leave']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to amend the statement of claim is granted because the delay was adequately explained, the amendments provide sufficient clarity for the respondents to plead to, there is no undue prejudice as the matter is not close to trial, and the proposed amendments are not, on their face, futile or bound to fail. Case management principles justify permitting the matter to proceed with clarified pleadings, supported by directions for discovery and further particulars.

Court Disposition

Leave to amend granted; directions given for amended pleadings, particulars, discovery, and costs.

Orders

  • ['Leave to amend the statement of claim granted in terms of the minute dated 28 September 2018.' 'Applicants to file and serve the amended statement of claim by 4.00 pm on 19 October 2018.' 'Applicants to provide particulars of the amended statement of claim by 26 October 2018 as detailed in the order.' 'Respondents...