Whittaker v Child Support Registrar (No. 4) [2009] FCA 387
The application to widen the scope of the leave application in respect of paragraph 32 of the Amended Statement of Claim was dismissed for the same reasons previously given for rejecting challenges concerning paragraphs 24 and 25, and because the applicants had not pressed paragraph 32 before the primary judge.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Widen the Scope of an Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'pleadings' 'repleading Amended Statement of Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Widen the Scope of an Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the scope of the application for leave to appeal should be widened to include a challenge to the primary judge's refusal of leave to replead paragraph 32 of the Amended Statement of Claim."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application to widen the scope of the leave application in respect of paragraph 32 of the Amended Statement of Claim was dismissed for the same reasons previously given for rejecting challenges concerning paragraphs 24 and 25, and because the applicants had not pressed paragraph 32 before the primary judge.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ["The application made ore tenus to widen the scope of the application for leave to appeal to include a challenge to the primary judge's findings in respect of paragraph 32 of the Amended Statement of Claim be dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment