Young v Sprague [2014] NSWCA 456

Young v Sprague [2014] NSWCA 456

Leave to appeal was refused because nothing in the appellant's written or oral submissions demonstrated any reasonable prospects of success. The video and photographic material did not provide a basis to overturn findings substantially based on credit and DVD evidence, no arguable error was shown in the conclusion that entry onto the Property was authorised by the PCA Act and lawful, no arguable basis was identified for increasing damages, the case raised no issue of general principle, the amount in issue was small, and refusal of leave would not cause substantial injustice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2014
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time From a District Court Decision / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons for Leave to Appeal and Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Time for filing the summons for leave to appeal was extended, but the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'prospects of Success' 'trespass to Land' 'trespass to Chattels' 'statutory Authority Under Animal Welfare Legislation' 'aggravated Damages']
['appeal' 'civil Procedure' 'trespass' 'animal Welfare'] ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'prospects of Success' 'trespass to Land' 'trespass to Chattels' 'statutory Authority Under Animal Welfare Legislation' 'aggravated Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time From a District Court Decision / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons for Leave to Appeal and Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether time should be extended for filing the summons for leave to appeal.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the District Court decision.' 'Whether the proposed appeal had reasonable prospects of success, including on challenges to credibility findings, alleged false testimony, statutory authority for entry onto the Property, breach of contract, and damages.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because nothing in the appellant's written or oral submissions demonstrated any reasonable prospects of success. The video and photographic material did not provide a basis to overturn findings substantially based on credit and DVD evidence, no arguable error was shown in the conclusion that entry onto the Property was authorised by the PCA Act and lawful, no arguable basis was identified for increasing damages, the case raised no issue of general principle, the amount in issue was small, and refusal of leave would not cause substantial injustice.

Court Disposition

Time for filing the summons for leave to appeal was extended, but the summons for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Extend the time for filing the summons for leave to appeal until 1 October 2014.' 'Dismiss the summons.' "Order the applicant (Mr Young) to pay the respondents' costs of the summons for leave to appeal and of the application for an extension of time to file the summons."]