Hopkins, Ann v Seymour Softwoods Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 1354
Leave to file the cross-claim, except for specified paragraphs (16, 17, 21), is granted as the issues arising are necessarily connected to the outcome of the main action and can be dealt with efficiently in the same proceeding, provided appropriate safeguards are put in place. The Court's obligation to determine all related matters in one proceeding outweighs timeliness concerns, subject to protection of the applicant through security for costs and opportunity to seek rescission if substantial procedural difficulties arise.
- Parties
- Applicant/cross Respondent: ann hopkins; First Respondent/cross Claimant: seymour softwoods limited (Controller Appointed) (acn 007 055 889); Second Respondent/cross Claimant: sintoff pty limited (Receiver Appointed) (acn 006 621 487); Third Respondent/cross Claimant: berrema finance pty limited (Receiver Appointed) (acn 005 982 605); Fourth Respondent: equuscorp pty limited (formerly called equus financial services limited) (acn 006 012 344)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Practice & Procedure / Application for Leave to File Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Leave to file cross-claim granted in part; application allowed in part; costs ordered against first, second, and third respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to File Cross Claim, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ann hopkins
Applicant/cross Respondent
seymour softwoods limited (Controller Appointed) (acn 007 055 889)
First Respondent/cross Claimant
sintoff pty limited (Receiver Appointed) (acn 006 621 487)
Second Respondent/cross Claimant
berrema finance pty limited (Receiver Appointed) (acn 005 982 605)
Third Respondent/cross Claimant
equuscorp pty limited (formerly called equus financial services limited) (acn 006 012 344)
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Practice & Procedure / Application for Leave to File Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to file a cross-claim after the ordinary time
- 2 Whether particular paragraphs (16, 17, 21) of the proposed cross-claim should be allowed
- 3 Whether further evidence should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to file the cross-claim, except for specified paragraphs (16, 17, 21), is granted as the issues arising are necessarily connected to the outcome of the main action and can be dealt with efficiently in the same proceeding, provided appropriate safeguards are put in place. The Court's obligation to determine all related matters in one proceeding outweighs timeliness concerns, subject to protection of the applicant through security for costs and opportunity to seek rescission if substantial procedural difficulties arise.
Court Disposition
Leave to file cross-claim granted in part; application allowed in part; costs ordered against first, second, and third respondents.
Orders
- Leave granted to first, second and third respondents to file cross-claim, except as to paragraphs sixteen, seventeen, and twenty-one (leave refused for those).
- No further evidence in respect of issues raised by the cross-claim may be adduced without leave of the Court, such leave to be sought by 17 December 1997.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment