Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (ACN 007 656 555) [2004] FCA 554
Having regard to all matters, including the sufficient relevance of s 127 ASIC Act and the ability to remedy any prejudice by allowing respondents adequate time and costs, the Court granted leave for the supplementary submissions to be filed and served on terms, distinguishing this interlocutory context from appellate proceedings where strict finality applies.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Anthony Patrick Spalla; Second Applicant: Andrew David Bentley Still; Third Applicant: Irlmond Pty Ltd (ACN 066 314 870) (Receivers and Managers appointed; in liquidation); First Respondent: St George Motor Finance Ltd (ACN 007 656 555); Second Respondent: St George Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd (ACN 001 834 886); Third Respondent: Andrew William Beck; Fourth Respondent: Andrew Stewart Home; Fifth Respondent: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu; Sixth Respondent: Australian Securities and Investments Commission; Seventh Respondent: Simon Alexander Wallace Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Supplementary Written Submissions
- Outcome
- Leave granted to applicants to file and serve supplementary submissions (dated 23 April 2004); consequential orders as to time and costs; liberty to apply.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to File Submissions, Supplementary Submissions, Court Discretion, Implied Undertaking, Stay of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Patrick Spalla
First Applicant
Andrew David Bentley Still
Second Applicant
Irlmond Pty Ltd (ACN 066 314 870) (Receivers and Managers appointed; in liquidation)
Third Applicant
St George Motor Finance Ltd (ACN 007 656 555)
First Respondent
St George Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd (ACN 001 834 886)
Second Respondent
Andrew William Beck
Third Respondent
Andrew Stewart Home
Fourth Respondent
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Fifth Respondent
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Sixth Respondent
Simon Alexander Wallace Smith
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Supplementary Written Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to applicants to file and serve supplementary written submissions after the oral hearing and without prior leave
- 2 Whether the supplementary submissions concern an exceptional point warranting departure from the general rule that hearings are the time for arguments
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to all matters, including the sufficient relevance of s 127 ASIC Act and the ability to remedy any prejudice by allowing respondents adequate time and costs, the Court granted leave for the supplementary submissions to be filed and served on terms, distinguishing this interlocutory context from appellate proceedings where strict finality applies.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to applicants to file and serve supplementary submissions (dated 23 April 2004); consequential orders as to time and costs; liberty to apply.
Orders
- The applicants have leave to file and serve the supplementary submissions dated 23 April 2004 which are exhibit AA-86 to the affidavit of April Arslan sworn 27 April 2004 and filed herein.
- The respondents have leave to file and serve by 11 May 2004 any written submissions and any further affidavit on which they wish to rely in answer to the supplementary submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment