Bulong Nickel Pty Ltd v Bateman Project Engineering Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1900
On the material presented, the applicants established a prima facie case in respect of the claims made against the third and fourth respondents for misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 and s 82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), negligence, and breach of collateral contract; consequently, it is appropriate to grant leave to serve originating process outside Australia on the third and fourth respondents.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Bulong Nickel Pty Ltd (ACN 000 807 036); Second Applicant: Bulong Operations Pty Ltd (ACN 008 930 881); First Respondent: Bateman Project Engineering Pty Ltd (ACN 056 741 596); Second Respondent: Kinhill Pacific Pty Ltd (ACN 010 241 620); Third Respondent: SNC-Lavalin Engineers & Constructors Inc; Fourth Respondent: Kilborn Engineering & Construction Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Out of Australia / Interlocutory Motion for Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Leave granted to serve originating process outside Australia on the third and fourth respondents.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Serve Process Outside Australia, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Negligence in Engineering Services, Breach of Contract, Collateral Contract, Jurisdiction, Prima Facie Case Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bulong Nickel Pty Ltd (ACN 000 807 036)
First Applicant
Bulong Operations Pty Ltd (ACN 008 930 881)
Second Applicant
Bateman Project Engineering Pty Ltd (ACN 056 741 596)
First Respondent
Kinhill Pacific Pty Ltd (ACN 010 241 620)
Second Respondent
SNC-Lavalin Engineers & Constructors Inc
Third Respondent
Kilborn Engineering & Construction Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Out of Australia / Interlocutory Motion for Leave to Serve Out of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to serve originating process on the third and fourth respondents outside the Commonwealth of Australia
- 2 Whether applicants have established a prima facie case for relief sought against foreign respondents
Ratio Decidendi
On the material presented, the applicants established a prima facie case in respect of the claims made against the third and fourth respondents for misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 and s 82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), negligence, and breach of collateral contract; consequently, it is appropriate to grant leave to serve originating process outside Australia on the third and fourth respondents.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to serve originating process outside Australia on the third and fourth respondents.
Orders
- Applicants granted leave to serve the Application and Amended Statement of Claim outside Australia on the third and fourth respondents by service in accordance with Canadian law.
- Copies of the Application served must be endorsed in red ink with the terms of Order 9 rule 7 of the Federal Court Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment