Temwell Pty Ltd v DKGR Holdings Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 967
Privilege in documents held by Deacons Lawyers may be joint as between DDS, D&E, and Mr Elbaum, but where relevant affidavits by Elbaum or Cattanach amount to disclosure of the substance of legal advice, privilege is impliedly waived over documents relating to that advice and these should be disclosed to the mCom respondents’ legal advisers.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application (privilege Claim in Civil Proceedings) / Ruling on Privilege in Subpoenaed Documents
- Outcome
- Partial waiver of privilege; some documents to be disclosed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'waiver of Privilege' 'subpoena of Documents' 'joint Privilege']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application (privilege Claim in Civil Proceedings) / Ruling on Privilege in Subpoenaed Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether legal professional privilege applies to documents held by Deacons Lawyers on behalf of Mr Elbaum and D & E Consulting Pty Ltd.' 'Whether the privilege is joint as between DDS, Mr Elbaum, and D&E, or limited to DDS.' 'Whether privilege was waived by statements in affidavits or actions by joint holders.']
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege in documents held by Deacons Lawyers may be joint as between DDS, D&E, and Mr Elbaum, but where relevant affidavits by Elbaum or Cattanach amount to disclosure of the substance of legal advice, privilege is impliedly waived over documents relating to that advice and these should be disclosed to the mCom respondents’ legal advisers.
Court Disposition
Partial waiver of privilege; some documents to be disclosed; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Privilege waived for certain documents as identified in the schedule and ruling; documents to be made available to mCom respondents’ legal advisers as specified.' 'Other documents to be reviewed by the court if privilege or waiver remains in dispute after further evidence or cross-examination.' 'Questions of costs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment