A3 v Australian Crime Commission [2006] FCA 894
The interests of justice are best served by allowing the affidavit to be read, on the basis that orders are made restricting disclosure and publication to respondents and their legal representatives, subject to the affidavit and exhibits being otherwise admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admission of Evidence
- Outcome
- Affidavit may be read; orders restricting access and publication made, subject to further consideration of admissibility of contents
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'public Interest Immunity' 'admissibility of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admission of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether certain documents are protected by legal professional privilege' 'Whether affidavit and exhibits should be admitted into evidence subject to orders restricting access' 'Balancing public interest in full evidence and procedural fairness against secrecy/ confidentiality required for criminal investigations']
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of justice are best served by allowing the affidavit to be read, on the basis that orders are made restricting disclosure and publication to respondents and their legal representatives, subject to the affidavit and exhibits being otherwise admissible.
Court Disposition
Affidavit may be read; orders restricting access and publication made, subject to further consideration of admissibility of contents
Orders
- ['Affidavit of Mr Ian MacDonald Andrew sworn 5 May 2006 may be read, subject to restriction that it not be disclosed to any person other than respondents and their legal representatives and that publication of it or its contents is prohibited.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment