A3 v Australian Crime Commission [2006] FCA 894

A3 v Australian Crime Commission [2006] FCA 894

The interests of justice are best served by allowing the affidavit to be read, on the basis that orders are made restricting disclosure and publication to respondents and their legal representatives, subject to the affidavit and exhibits being otherwise admissible.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admission of Evidence
Outcome
Affidavit may be read; orders restricting access and publication made, subject to further consideration of admissibility of contents
Legal Topics
['legal Professional Privilege' 'public Interest Immunity' 'admissibility of Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admission of Evidence

  1. 1 ['Whether certain documents are protected by legal professional privilege' 'Whether affidavit and exhibits should be admitted into evidence subject to orders restricting access' 'Balancing public interest in full evidence and procedural fairness against secrecy/ confidentiality required for criminal investigations']

Ratio Decidendi

The interests of justice are best served by allowing the affidavit to be read, on the basis that orders are made restricting disclosure and publication to respondents and their legal representatives, subject to the affidavit and exhibits being otherwise admissible.

Court Disposition

Affidavit may be read; orders restricting access and publication made, subject to further consideration of admissibility of contents

Orders

  • ['Affidavit of Mr Ian MacDonald Andrew sworn 5 May 2006 may be read, subject to restriction that it not be disclosed to any person other than respondents and their legal representatives and that publication of it or its contents is prohibited.']