Commonwealth v Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board [1926] HCA 39

Commonwealth v Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board [1926] HCA 39

The Shipping Board did not have power under the Commonwealth Shipping Act 1923 to enter into a contract for the supply, delivery, and erection of turbo-alternators for the Municipal Council of Sydney, and if the Act purported to confer such power, that part would be beyond the legislative competence of the Commonwealth. The Attorney-General had standing to seek relief. Accordingly, the demurrers were overruled.

Parties
Plaintiffs: The Commonwealth and the Attorney-General for the Commonwealth (on the relation of Frank L. Edwards); First Defendant: Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board; Second Defendant: Municipal Council of Sydney
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 November 1926
Procedural Posture
Original Action—demurrer / Ruling on Demurrers
Outcome
Demurrers overruled with costs.
Legal Topics
Legislative Powers, Ultra Vires, Public Bodies—statutory Powers, Standing of Attorney General, Statutory Construction
Constitutional Law Legislative Powers Ultra Vires Public Bodies—statutory Powers Standing of Attorney General Statutory Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Commonwealth and the Attorney-General for the Commonwealth (on the relation of Frank L. Edwards)

Plaintiffs

Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board

First Defendant

Municipal Council of Sydney

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Original Action—demurrer / Ruling on Demurrers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Australian Commonwealth Shipping Board had power to enter into a contract for the supply and erection of turbo-alternators for the Municipal Council of Sydney under the Commonwealth Shipping Act 1923
  2. 2 Whether the statute, if conferring such a power, was within the legislative power of the Commonwealth Parliament
  3. 3 Whether the Attorney-General for the Commonwealth had standing to challenge the contract

Ratio Decidendi

The Shipping Board did not have power under the Commonwealth Shipping Act 1923 to enter into a contract for the supply, delivery, and erection of turbo-alternators for the Municipal Council of Sydney, and if the Act purported to confer such power, that part would be beyond the legislative competence of the Commonwealth. The Attorney-General had standing to seek relief. Accordingly, the demurrers were overruled.

Court Disposition

Demurrers overruled with costs.

Orders

  • Demurrers of each defendant overruled with costs.