SOAMES v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2001] NSWSC 1043
The claims relating to paragraphs 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, and 5 are statute barred as they arose more than six years prior to commencement of proceedings, and no grounds for estoppel or extension of limitation period were established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Strike Out Pleading / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Motion granted
- Legal Topics
- ['limitation of Actions' 'strike Out Applications' 'particularisation of Pleadings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application to Strike Out Pleading / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether paragraphs relating to alleged defamations are statute barred under the Limitations Act 1969' 'Whether sufficient particularisation has been provided for alleged defamatory statements' 'Whether any estoppel prevented the defendant from relying on the limitation defence']
Ratio Decidendi
The claims relating to paragraphs 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, and 5 are statute barred as they arose more than six years prior to commencement of proceedings, and no grounds for estoppel or extension of limitation period were established.
Court Disposition
Motion granted
Orders
- ["The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs." 'The matter is to be placed in the Defamation List for call-over.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment