Onethree Pty Ltd v Seaman [2018] NSWCATCD 83
The contract provided an exclusive remedy for delay damages via the liquidated damages rate and excluded the owners’ right to common law damages. Progress payments were owed to the builder; owners' cross claims for non-authorised progress payments and non-economic loss failed as the statutory and contractual thresholds were not met. $1,000.00 was allowed for wrongful retention of possession, and set-off applied.
- Parties
- Applicant/builder: Onethree Pty Ltd; Respondent/owner: Dayne Seaman; Respondent/owner: Danielle Corrigan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Building Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Builder's claim allowed less owners' successful cross claim by way of set-off; owners’ other claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidated Damages, Delay Damages, Statutory Warranties, Contractual Interpretation, Right of Possession, Exemplary Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onethree Pty Ltd
Applicant/builder
Dayne Seaman
Respondent/owner
Danielle Corrigan
Respondent/owner
Procedural Posture
Building Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to progress payment
- 2 Owner's entitlement to delay damages beyond liquidated damages
- 3 Unlawfully claimed progress payments under Home Building Act 1989
Ratio Decidendi
The contract provided an exclusive remedy for delay damages via the liquidated damages rate and excluded the owners’ right to common law damages. Progress payments were owed to the builder; owners' cross claims for non-authorised progress payments and non-economic loss failed as the statutory and contractual thresholds were not met. $1,000.00 was allowed for wrongful retention of possession, and set-off applied.
Court Disposition
Builder's claim allowed less owners' successful cross claim by way of set-off; owners’ other claims dismissed.
Orders
- Dayne Seaman and Danielle Corrigan must pay Onethree Pty Ltd the sum of $44,941.85 immediately.
- Any costs application must be lodged in the Tribunal and served on the costs respondent within 14 days of the date of this order either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon in support of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment