DSE Transport Pty Ltd v Conglomeration Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 251

DSE Transport Pty Ltd v Conglomeration Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 251

The defendant did not establish any entitlement to a reduction, set-off, damages or variation beyond credits already allowed. The plaintiff had produced its records, and the defendant failed to identify or quantify any disputed invoices or further credits, apart from an unquantified 30-minute adjustment. Accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the full claimed sum and the cross-claim was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 June 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract Claim for Liquidated Sum With Cross Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff for $163,657.25; cross-claim dismissed; defendant/cross-claimant ordered to pay the plaintiff/cross-defendant's costs.
Legal Topics
['liquidated Sum' 'unpaid Invoices' 'set Off' 'contract Variation' 'cross Claim' 'interest Under Contract' 'costs']
['contract' 'civil Procedure' 'debt Recovery'] ['liquidated Sum' 'unpaid Invoices' 'set Off' 'contract Variation' 'cross Claim' 'interest Under Contract' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Contract Claim for Liquidated Sum With Cross Claim / Principal Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['The amount the defendant was liable to pay to the plaintiff for services provided and identified in invoices issued pursuant to the Agreement.' 'Whether the defendant and plaintiff agreed to any variation of the Agreement or entered into any further agreement with respect to amounts owing by the defendant under the Agreement.' 'If there was any such variation or further agreement, whether the defendant was entitled to recover any debt or damages from the plaintiff.']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant did not establish any entitlement to a reduction, set-off, damages or variation beyond credits already allowed. The plaintiff had produced its records, and the defendant failed to identify or quantify any disputed invoices or further credits, apart from an unquantified 30-minute adjustment. Accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the full claimed sum and the cross-claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff for $163,657.25; cross-claim dismissed; defendant/cross-claimant ordered to pay the plaintiff/cross-defendant's costs.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiff for $163,657.25.' 'The parties have liberty to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the mathematically agreed calculation of interest at the rate of 18.25% from 29th February 2020 to the date of judgment.' 'Cross-claim dismissed.' "Defendant/cross-claimant pay...