Caron v Said Jahani and John McInerney as joint and several liquidators of Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (In liq) and Courtenay House Pty Ltd (In liq) [2019] NSWCA 293
Court grants leave to commence appeal against companies in liquidation, appoints appellants and J P Melocco Pty Ltd as representative parties for their respective investor groups, authorises payment of legal costs from funds under liquidators' control (provided for by directions and subject to committee or registrar approval), and reserves allocation of costs between funds for determination by the appeal court; motions otherwise dismissed and costs of motions to be costs in appeal.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Peter Caron; Second Appellant: Anke Seidlitz; First Respondent: Said Jahani and John McInerney as joint and several liquidators of Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (In liq) and Courtenay House Pty Ltd (In liq); Second Respondent: Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (In liq); Third Respondent: Courtenay House Pty Ltd (In liq); Fourth Respondent: J P Melocco Pty Ltd; Fifth Respondent: LifeSmart Trading Pty Ltd; Sixth Respondent: Mr Ralph Del Vecchio
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Orders for Representation, Leave, and Costs
- Outcome
- Orders made for leave to appeal, appointment of representative parties, payment of legal costs, and relisting of appeal; motions otherwise dismissed; costs of motion to be costs in the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Liquidation, Managed Investment Scheme, Representative Proceedings, Distribution of Funds, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Caron
First Appellant
Anke Seidlitz
Second Appellant
Said Jahani and John McInerney as joint and several liquidators of Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (In liq) and Courtenay House Pty Ltd (In liq)
First Respondent
Courtenay House Capital Trading Group Pty Ltd (In liq)
Second Respondent
Courtenay House Pty Ltd (In liq)
Third Respondent
J P Melocco Pty Ltd
Fourth Respondent
LifeSmart Trading Pty Ltd
Fifth Respondent
Mr Ralph Del Vecchio
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Orders for Representation, Leave, and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Should leave to appeal be granted against companies in liquidation?
- 2 Who should be appointed as representative parties for different investor groups?
- 3 How and from which funds should relevant legal costs be paid?
Ratio Decidendi
Court grants leave to commence appeal against companies in liquidation, appoints appellants and J P Melocco Pty Ltd as representative parties for their respective investor groups, authorises payment of legal costs from funds under liquidators' control (provided for by directions and subject to committee or registrar approval), and reserves allocation of costs between funds for determination by the appeal court; motions otherwise dismissed and costs of motions to be costs in appeal.
Court Disposition
Orders made for leave to appeal, appointment of representative parties, payment of legal costs, and relisting of appeal; motions otherwise dismissed; costs of motion to be costs in the appeal.
Orders
- Leave granted to appellants to begin and proceed with appeal against second and third respondents under s 471B Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Appellants appointed to represent themselves and Post 21 April 2017 Westpac Investors in the appeal under r 7.6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment