In the matter of Jewels of Sydney Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2024] NSWSC 538
The costs agreement was entered into for the benefit of the JOS Companies, it was appropriate for the Liquidator to retain solicitors for the Deed of Assignment, the proceedings and the liquidations generally, and there was no basis to refuse approval under s 477(2B). The Confidential Bundle contained commercially sensitive material concerning the Deed of Assignment, potential recoveries, valuation of claims and alternative offers; disclosure to proposed defendants would confer a tactical benefit and prejudice the JOS Companies' interests in future litigation, so confidentiality orders were justified under ss 7, 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(e) of the Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Liquidator for Approval Under S 477(2 B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and for Suppression or Non Publication Orders / Ex Tempore Principal Judgment on Application for Approval of Costs Agreement and Confidentiality Orders; Application for Approval of Deed of Assignment Adjourned
- Outcome
- Approval nunc pro tunc of the costs agreement granted; confidentiality orders granted; balance of originating process adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['liquidator Powers' 'court Approval of Costs Agreement' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'open Justice' 'deed of Assignment of Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Liquidator for Approval Under S 477(2 B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) and for Suppression or Non Publication Orders / Ex Tempore Principal Judgment on Application for Approval of Costs Agreement and Confidentiality Orders; Application for Approval of Deed of Assignment Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should approve nunc pro tunc the Liquidator's entry into the costs agreement with Cornwalls under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)." 'Whether disclosure of the Confidential Bundle should be prohibited under ss 7, 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(e) of the Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The costs agreement was entered into for the benefit of the JOS Companies, it was appropriate for the Liquidator to retain solicitors for the Deed of Assignment, the proceedings and the liquidations generally, and there was no basis to refuse approval under s 477(2B). The Confidential Bundle contained commercially sensitive material concerning the Deed of Assignment, potential recoveries, valuation of claims and alternative offers; disclosure to proposed defendants would confer a tactical benefit and prejudice the JOS Companies' interests in future litigation, so confidentiality orders were justified under ss 7, 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(e) of the Courts Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act...
Court Disposition
Approval nunc pro tunc of the costs agreement granted; confidentiality orders granted; balance of originating process adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to section 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) the entry by the third plaintiff on behalf of the first and second plaintiffs into the costs agreement made on 2 February 2024 at pages 1 to 8 of Exhibit JL-1 to the affidavit of Jamieson Andre Louttit sworn 5 March 2024 is approved.' 'Pursuant to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment